[llvm-dev] Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct

[Renato Golin via llvm-dev]

On 6 May 2016 at 20:56, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote:
> That said, I wonder what folks think about strengthening the
> "de-intensifying" language? As a small change that might help:
>
> "In addition, violations of this code outside these spaces may, in rare
> cases, affect a person's ability to participate within them."

I prefer this change.

cheers,
--renato