[llvm-dev] Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct

[Renato Golin via llvm-dev]

On 6 May 2016 at 18:43, Philip Reames via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> FYI, several folks have expressed specific concern about that particular
> wording.  If we can find wording which rephrases that to address the concern
> while retaining the intent, that seems like an obvious thing to fix.

I've separated that myself, and done a bunch of wording review on
Phabricator. They were all pretty minor, but I think very relevant.

Feel free to have a look and comment on them, as I don't claim I know
better than anyone.

--renato