[llvm-dev] [GSoC 2016] Proposal: CFL-AA by default

[Jia Chen via llvm-dev]

Oops thanks for the reminder. I did use another email address and am 
terribly sorry for it.

Let me just post the link:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Kvepb-v5Ta8ug_lLK1kZeexPNlpvj62K5iIF0fMuLyM/edit?usp=sharing

On 03/25/2016 11:44 AM, John Criswell wrote:
> Dear Jia,
>
> I don't see your proposal in the system.  What is the title of your 
> proposal, and under what email address did you submit it?
>
> Regards,
>
> John Criswell
>
> On 3/23/16 4:09 PM, Jia Chen via llvm-dev wrote:
>> Dear llvm devs,
>>
>> Based on an earlier discussion about existing pointer analyses in 
>> LLVM, I quickly hacked up a GSoC proposal on enabling cfl-aa by default.
>>
>> The decision to write it was made two days before the application 
>> deadline, hence the writing quality may not be very satisfactory: the 
>> background section could be less verbose, and the implementation 
>> section could be more formal. Also it doesn't seem that I am able to 
>> come up with a tentative schedule since at this point, I have no idea 
>> how long each of the objective is going to take.
>>
>> I've shared my draft through the GSoC website. Any ideas on how I 
>> could improve are welcomed. Thanks in advance to everyone who is 
>> willing to take his/her time to read it.
>>
>
>
- Jia