[llvm-dev] Need help with code generation

[Rafael Espíndola via llvm-dev]

On 22 March 2016 at 16:02, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Rafael Espíndola <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> > That's because we seem to be debating whether we'd actively reject a
>> > patch to fix such issues, not how important they are to us to fix.
>>
>> I would not work on it. Including not review it while there are actual
>> missing features to be implemented.
>>
>>
>> If you want to call that a low priority bug, go for it. I don't find
>> it honest to do that myself.
>
>
> I wouldn't call this a "low priority bug". If you would not review patches
> to fix it (effectively blocking patches, I assume - I take it you would ask
> for such patches to be reverted if you hadn't reviewed/approved them?) that
> seems different to how the rest of the LLVM community treats these sort of
> issues.

I agree. which is why I don't want to call it a bug.

But since having a bug open for years causes far less discussion than
otherwise I am fine with it as long people know I will retire long
before I get to it.

Cheers,
Rafael