[llvm-dev] Need help with code generation

[Philip Reames via llvm-dev]

On 03/22/2016 01:02 PM, David Blaikie via llvm-dev wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Rafael Espíndola 
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>
>     > That's because we seem to be debating whether we'd actively reject a patch to fix such issues, not how
>     important they are to us to fix.
>
>     I would not work on it. Including not review it while there are actual
>     missing features to be implemented. 
>
>
>     If you want to call that a low priority bug, go for it. I don't find
>     it honest to do that myself.
>
>
> I wouldn't call this a "low priority bug". If you would not review 
> patches to fix it (effectively blocking patches, I assume - I take it 
> you would ask for such patches to be reverted if you hadn't 
> reviewed/approved them?) that seems different to how the rest of the 
> LLVM community treats these sort of issues.
I haven't seen Rafael state that he would either a) block others from 
reviewing this patches or b) revert patches reviewed by someone else.  
Merely not reviewing is different from either of those.

(Just being pedantic for clarity.)
>
> - David
>
>
>     Cheers,
>     Rafael
>     _______________________________________________
>     LLVM Developers mailing list
>     llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>     http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160322/c259d372/attachment.html>