[llvm-dev] [AArch64] Redzone vs. NeedsRealignment in AArch64FrameLowering.cpp:emitPrologue
Aditya K via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Mar 16 12:58:12 PDT 2016
Hi,
I have a question about the frame lowering when canUseRedzone is true.
In the following code, there appears to be no relation between `NeedsRealignment' and `canUseRedZone'.
Is is possible that stack would be realigned when it uses redzone?
AArch64FrameLowering.cpp
286 void AArch64FrameLowering::emitPrologue(MachineFunction &MF,
287 MachineBasicBlock &MBB) const {
.....
359 if (NumBytes) {
360 const bool NeedsRealignment = RegInfo->needsStackRealignment(MF);
361 unsigned scratchSPReg = AArch64::SP;
362
363 if (NeedsRealignment) {
364 scratchSPReg = findScratchNonCalleeSaveRegister(&MBB);
365 assert(scratchSPReg != AArch64::NoRegister);
366 }
367
368 // If we're a leaf function, try using the red zone.
369 if (!canUseRedZone(MF))
370 // FIXME: in the case of dynamic re-alignment, NumBytes doesn't have
371 // the correct value here, as NumBytes also includes padding bytes,
372 // which shouldn't be counted here.
373 emitFrameOffset(MBB, MBBI, DL, scratchSPReg, AArch64::SP, -NumBytes, TII,
374 MachineInstr::FrameSetup);
375
376 if (NeedsRealignment) {
377 const unsigned Alignment = MFI->getMaxAlignment();
378 const unsigned NrBitsToZero = countTrailingZeros(Alignment);
.....
Thanks,
-Aditya
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list