[llvm-dev] Revisiting our informal policy to support two versions of MSVC

[Jim Rowan via llvm-dev]

On Aug 2, 2016, at 12:24 PM, David Majnemer via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> In this case, dropping VS2013 allows us to use more C++11 features with confidence.  Notably, move constructors will be synthesized instead of having to be manually written (and kept in sync with data members getting added).
> 
> What do you all think?  Are folks still stuck on VS2013?

Dropping it would not be a problem for us.


Jim Rowan
jmr at codeaurora.org
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by the Linux Foundation



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160802/d121723e/attachment.html>