<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><br><div><div>On Aug 2, 2016, at 12:24 PM, David Majnemer via llvm-dev <<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">In this case, dropping VS2013 allows us to use more C++11 features with confidence. Notably, move constructors will be synthesized instead of having to be manually written (and kept in sync with data members getting added).</div><div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><br></div><div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">What do you all think? Are folks still stuck on VS2013?</div></blockquote><br></div><div>Dropping it would not be a problem for us.</div><div><br></div><br><div apple-content-edited="true">
Jim Rowan<br><a href="mailto:jmr@codeaurora.org">jmr@codeaurora.org</a><br>Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by the Linux Foundation<br><br><br>
</div>
<br></body></html>