[llvm-dev] XDEBUG build bots?

[Matthias Braun via llvm-dev]

Would it make sense to include -verify-machineinstrs into XDEBUG ad well?

> On Apr 29, 2016, at 8:36 AM, Filipe Cabecinhas via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for noticing this, Geoff.
> 
> I just landed r268050 which add a cmake option for this (and unifies XDEBUG and EXPENSIVE_CHECKS). This might make it easier to setup some build bots.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
>   Filipe
> 
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Geoff Berry via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> Bugs filed:
>> 
>> 27488	librarie	Scalar O	unassignedbugs at nondot.org	NEW	---	[StructurizeCFG] lit test hits assert in verifyDomTree when compiled w/ XDEBUG	14:34:06
>> 27487	librarie	Scalar O	unassignedbugs at nondot.org	NEW	---	[LoopVersioning] lit test hits invalid domtree assert w/ XDEBUG	14:31:56
>> 27486	librarie	Scalar O	unassignedbugs at nondot.org	NEW	---	[InductiveRangeCheckElimination] invalidates domtree and hits asserts w/ XDEBUG	14:29:00
>> 27485	librarie	Backend:	unassignedbugs at nondot.org	NEW	---	[X86] Codegen/X86/selectiondag-cse.ll hits assert when LLVM compiled with XDEBUG	14:13:03
>> 27483	librarie	Common C	unassignedbugs at nondot.org	NEW	---	[SelectionDAG] LegalizeTypes hits asserts in PerformExpensiveChecks when compiled with XDEBUG	14:12:59
>> 27484	librarie	Backend:	unassignedbugs at nondot.org	NEW	---	[ARM] Codegen/Thumb/segmented-stacks.ll hits assert when llvm compiled w/ XDEBUG
>> 
>>> On 4/22/2016 12:11 PM, Geoff Berry via llvm-dev wrote:
>>> Yeah, they are just triggered by lit check tests.  I’ll file some bugs today, though it looks like Quentin may have already filed bugs for some of these.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> Geoff Berry
>>> 
>>> Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
>>> 
>>> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: Daniel Berlin [mailto:dberlin at dberlin.org] 
>>> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 12:05 PM
>>> To: Geoff Berry <gberry at codeaurora.org>
>>> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] XDEBUG build bots?
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Geoff Berry via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi All,
>>> 
>>> Are there any bots that do any testing with clang/llvm built with XDEBUG
>>> (i.e. expensive checking)?  I'm seeing 36 lit tests that currently hit
>>> asserts that are checked when XDEBUG is enabled.  The checks that I'm
>>> hitting are:
>>> - DominatorTree::verifyDomTree()
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> This seems super bad ;)
>>> 
>>> Have a testcase?
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>> 
>>  -- 
>> Geoff Berry
>> Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
>>  Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160429/b238d8ad/attachment.html>