[llvm-dev] XDEBUG build bots?

Filipe Cabecinhas via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri Apr 29 08:36:11 PDT 2016


Thanks for noticing this, Geoff.

I just landed r268050 which add a cmake option for this (and unifies XDEBUG
and EXPENSIVE_CHECKS). This might make it easier to setup some build bots.

Thank you,

  Filipe

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Geoff Berry via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> Bugs filed:
> 27488 <https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27488> librarie Scalar O
> unassignedbugs at nondot.org NEW --- [StructurizeCFG] lit test hits assert
> in verifyDomTree when compiled w/ XDEBUG
> <https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27488> 14:34:06
> 27487 <https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27487> librarie Scalar O
> unassignedbugs at nondot.org NEW --- [LoopVersioning] lit test hits invalid
> domtree assert w/ XDEBUG <https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27487>
> 14:31:56
> 27486 <https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27486> librarie Scalar O
> unassignedbugs at nondot.org NEW --- [InductiveRangeCheckElimination]
> invalidates domtree and hits asserts w/ XDEBUG
> <https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27486> 14:29:00
> 27485 <https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27485> librarie Backend:
> unassignedbugs at nondot.org NEW --- [X86] Codegen/X86/selectiondag-cse.ll
> hits assert when LLVM compiled with XDEBUG
> <https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27485> 14:13:03
> 27483 <https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27483> librarie Common C
> unassignedbugs at nondot.org NEW --- [SelectionDAG] LegalizeTypes hits
> asserts in PerformExpensiveChecks when compiled with XDEBUG
> <https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27483> 14:12:59
> 27484 <https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27484> librarie Backend:
> unassignedbugs at nondot.org NEW --- [ARM] Codegen/Thumb/segmented-stacks.ll
> hits assert when llvm compiled w/ XDEBUG
> <https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27484>
>
> On 4/22/2016 12:11 PM, Geoff Berry via llvm-dev wrote:
>
> Yeah, they are just triggered by lit check tests.  I’ll file some bugs
> today, though it looks like Quentin may have already filed bugs for some of
> these.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Geoff Berry
>
> Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
>
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux
> Foundation Collaborative Project
>
>
>
> *From:* Daniel Berlin [mailto:dberlin at dberlin.org <dberlin at dberlin.org>]
> *Sent:* Friday, April 22, 2016 12:05 PM
> *To:* Geoff Berry <gberry at codeaurora.org> <gberry at codeaurora.org>
> *Cc:* llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [llvm-dev] XDEBUG build bots?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Geoff Berry via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Are there any bots that do any testing with clang/llvm built with XDEBUG
> (i.e. expensive checking)?  I'm seeing 36 lit tests that currently hit
> asserts that are checked when XDEBUG is enabled.  The checks that I'm
> hitting are:
> - DominatorTree::verifyDomTree()
>
>
>
> This seems super bad ;)
>
> Have a testcase?
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing listllvm-dev at lists.llvm.orghttp://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
> --
> Geoff Berry
> Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
>  Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160429/e8843089/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list