[llvm-dev] Lazily Loaded Modules and Linker::LinkOnlyNeeded
Neil Henning via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Apr 20 05:20:46 PDT 2016
TL;DR - when linking from a lazily loaded module and using
Linker::LinkOnlyNeeded, bodies of used functions aren't being copied
during linking.
Previously on one of our products, we would lazily load our runtime
module (around 9000 functions), and link some user module into this
(which is in all practical use cases much smaller). Then, post linking,
we have a pass that runs over the module and rips out all the
un-materialized functions that weren't being used in the original user
module.
I only just noticed that LinkModules has a flags parameter that can take
a LinkOnlyNeeded flag, which made me wonder if I could reverse the link
order (EG. link from the lazily loaded runtime module into the user
module), set the LinkOnlyNeeded flag, and hey presto, we wouldn't need
to have a cleanup pass that ran afterwards ripping out functions that
weren't used.
So I tried it, and it failed. Basically any function that was still to
be materialized wasn't getting its body copied over during linking.
The only line of code that differs when you set LinkOnlyNeeded is in
LinkModules.cpp -> ModuleLinker::linkIfNeeded:
if (shouldLinkOnlyNeeded() && !(DGV && DGV->isDeclaration()))
return false;
The isDeclaration() for functions has a call to isMaterializable().
Things I've tried:
* If I don't pass LinkOnlyNeeded but still link from the lazily loaded
runtime module into the user module, it works (albeit it is orders
of magnitude slower like we'd expect).
* If I don't lazily load the runtime module, it works (but again, much
slower).
* I tried doing the linking and then materializing the newly linked
module, but the runtime functions were still missing their bodies
(which implies the information was lost during linking).
* If I hack the LinkModules.cpp code such that it checks if the DGV
could be materialized, and if so materialize it, before checking for
a declaration again, it works:
if (shouldLinkOnlyNeeded() && !(DGV && DGV->isDeclaration())) {
if (DGV && DGV->isMaterializable())
DGV->materialize();
if (!(DGV && DGV->isDeclaration()))
return false;
}
Even with the extra cost of the hack above - this has resulted in a 2x
speedup in our total link time.
So really here I am wondering - is this expected behaviour? A bug? And
if so how best to go about fixing the issue would be some grand advice
from people more in the know!
Cheers,
-Neil.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160420/7b2229ad/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list