[llvm-dev] RFC: LTO should use -disable-llvm-verifier

[James Y Knight via llvm-dev]

On Sep 8, 2015, at 1:52 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> Is there anyone who actually needs to do this? Why can't they upgrade
>> their linker?
> 
> While it's fairly easy for external people (like you) to compile a
> new version of clang/libLTO.dylib, without the ld64 sources it would
> be hard to compile a new version of the linker.

Are these ld64 sources not sufficient for that?
http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/ld64/ld64-242/ <http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/ld64/ld64-242/>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150908/e8f8a0a3/attachment.html>