<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div><div class="">On Sep 8, 2015, at 1:52 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via llvm-dev <<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" class="">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">Is there anyone who actually needs to do this? Why can't they upgrade<br class=""></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class="">their linker?<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">While it's fairly easy for external people (like you) to compile a<br class="">new version of clang/libLTO.dylib, without the ld64 sources it would<br class="">be hard to compile a new version of the linker.</div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div>Are these ld64 sources not sufficient for that?</div><div><a href="http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/ld64/ld64-242/" class="">http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/ld64/ld64-242/</a></div><div><br class=""></div></body></html>