[llvm-dev] Hexagon, DFAPacketizer and instruction expansion

[Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev]

On 11/18/2015 6:02 PM, Rail Shafigulin wrote:
>
> I guess I should be more clear by what I mean "expanded". When I say
> "expanded" I mean the final instruction assembly representation, i.e.
> all instructions were lowered to their assembly level. Will you
> recommendation still hold or I should be considering another approach?

For dealing with cases like the RET instruction you described 
earlier---yes, the post-RA pseudo instruction expansion is the right 
place to do it.

-Krzysztof

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, 
hosted by The Linux Foundation