[llvm-dev] DFAPacketizer assert failure

Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 16 11:32:16 PST 2015


On 11/16/2015 1:14 PM, Rail Shafigulin via llvm-dev wrote:
>
> This happens at the packetization stage, i.e. scheduling seems to work.
> My schedule description is not very different from Hexagon or R600. I'm
> not quite sure why this is happening. Would someone be able to shed some
> light on this?

It's hard to make a guess based on that assertion alone.  Apparently 
there is no transition in the DFA for these values.

Do the arguments (e.g. CurrentState and FuncUnits) look reasonable?

-Krzysztof

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, 
hosted by The Linux Foundation


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list