[LLVMdev] Doxygen: enable autobrief?

Justin Bogner mail at justinbogner.com
Sun May 3 21:08:39 PDT 2015


Matthias Braun <matze at braunis.de> writes:
> We just had some discussion in the IRC channel and wondered whether it
> would be a good idea to enable one of the doxygen autobrief options
> for llvm:
>
> JAVADOC_AUTOBRIEF
> If the JAVADOC_AUTOBRIEF tag is set to YES then doxygen will interpret
> the first line (until the first dot) of a Javadoc-style comment as the
> brief description. If set to NO, the Javadoc-style will behave just
> like regular Qt-style comments (thus requiring an explicit @brief
> command for a brief description.)
>
> The default value is: NO.
>
> QT_AUTOBRIEF
> If the QT_AUTOBRIEF tag is set to YES then doxygen will interpret the
> first line (until the first dot) of a Qt-style comment as the brief
> description. If set to NO, the Qt-style will behave just like regular
> Qt-style comments (thus requiring an explicit \brief command for a
> brief description.)
>
> The default value is: NO.
>
>
> Seeing that the \brief commands are often missing and visually noisy
> (IMO) this may improve our documentation and save us some typing in
> the future.

FWIW, I can't see any downside to enabling this option. Adding \brief is
redundant and hurts readability in the source, and the fact that we're
inconsistent about it means the experience in the doxygen-generated html
is often missing summaries for functions, which is annoying. Setting the
autobrief option improves both of these problems.

+1.

> - Matthias
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list