[LLVMdev] unwind's permanent residence

[Dan Albert]

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org>
wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>
> wrote:
>
>> What about the default unwinder for Compiler-RT? Should we assume our
>> own? Gcc's? Assuming nothing will break compilation, since the libraries
>> won't be available...
>>
> I think that assuming libunwind by default is the better choice.  Assuming
> that GCC is installed is an odd assumption (I don't see anywhere in the
> docs that in order to use clang, you *must* have gcc installed in the
> standard location).  Users can easily change the default behaviour with the
> flag if they desire.
>

Shouldn't it just use the default unwinder for the given platform?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150130/6178cdf6/attachment.html>