[LLVMdev] RFC: variable names

[Rafael Espíndola]

>>> After having read through this long thread, I'm having trouble
>>> spotting a case of someone saying lowerCamelCase variable names is a
>>> bad idea.  Nick's original proposal looks good to me.  What do we need
>>> to do to move forward here?
>>
>> If everyone agrees (I don't mind one way or the other as long as lld
>> and llvm end up having one style
>
> +1
>
>> ), the next question is how to change
>> it.
>>
>> Given that we haven't finished changing the function names and the
>> style was change in r120689 (2010-12-02), I think that if we change
>> anything we should just use clang-tidy to do the transition in a few
>> patches.
>
> I agree with this approach.  (Should we fix function names too?)

That would be my preference (also fixing function names).

Cheers,
Rafael