[LLVMdev] RFC: variable names

[Duncan P. N. Exon Smith]

> On 2015 Jan 13, at 10:51, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 13 January 2015 at 00:20, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote:
>> After having read through this long thread, I'm having trouble
>> spotting a case of someone saying lowerCamelCase variable names is a
>> bad idea.  Nick's original proposal looks good to me.  What do we need
>> to do to move forward here?
> 
> If everyone agrees (I don't mind one way or the other as long as lld
> and llvm end up having one style

+1

> ), the next question is how to change
> it.
> 
> Given that we haven't finished changing the function names and the
> style was change in r120689 (2010-12-02), I think that if we change
> anything we should just use clang-tidy to do the transition in a few
> patches.

I agree with this approach.  (Should we fix function names too?)