[LLVMdev] question about enabling cfl-aa and collecting a57 numbers
Daniel Berlin
dberlin at dberlin.org
Fri Jan 16 13:35:18 PST 2015
As we chatted about offline, i think we all agree this ordering is
completely and utterly broken
(right now it's BasicAA,ScopedAA, TBAA, CFLAA), and that BasicAA should
really be going last.
But this is also currently deliberate to "support type punning".[1]
But i'm not in for fixing that right now, and it doesn't change that CFLAA
was not delegating properly, and doesn't change how to fix this CFLAA bug :)
Patch updated to revert ordering changes and attached
[1] I know you have some ideas on how to fix this, but actually, I wonder
if it wouldn't be better to move deliberate type punning into it's own
AliasAnalysis, where the behavior will be both obvious and hopefully
written well. Then we can just run that at the top of the stack.
Certainly, your way was easier :)
On Fri Jan 16 2015 at 1:11:46 PM Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
wrote:
> I'm pretty sure I had the ordering of the passes backwards. The previous
> ordering is correct. Sorry for the confusion.
>
> The last alias analysis created is the first one queried. It delegates to
> the previous alias analysis created. At least, that is my reading of this
> (very confusing) code.
>
> The most frustrating aspect of this is that it means the delegation
> behavior of CFL shouldn't have mattered at all because BasicAA ran first...
> However BasicAA does do its own caching, so who knows.
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Okay, overnight i ran a ton of tests on this patch, and it seems right.
>> Nick, Hal, can you review it?
>>
>> I've reattached it for simplicity
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 15 January 2015 at 13:10, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes.
>>>>> I've attached an updated patch that does the following:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Fixes the partialalias of globals/arguments
>>>>> 2. Enables partialalias for cases where nothing has been unified to a
>>>>> global/argument
>>>>> 3. Fixes that select was unifying the condition to the other pieces
>>>>> (the condition does not need to be processed :P). This was causing
>>>>> unnecessary aliasing.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Consider this:
>>>>
>>>> void *p = ...;
>>>> uintptr_t i = p;
>>>> uintptr_t j = 0;
>>>> for (int a = 0; a < sizeof(uintptr_t); ++a) {
>>>> j = i >> (sizeof(uintptr_t) - a - 1) ? 1 : 0;
>>>> j <<= 1;
>>>> }
>>>> void *q = j;
>>>>
>>>> alias(p, q) isn't NoAlias. (Okay, it kinda is in C++, but not in the
>>>> equivalent LLVM IR. Please don't make me rewrite my example in LLVM IR.)
>>>>
>>>> Agreed :)
>>>
>>> But after chatting with you, i think we both agree that this change does
>>> not affect.
>>> I probably should not have said "the condition does not need to be
>>> processed". It would be more accurate to say "the reference to a condition
>>> in a select instruction, by itself, does not cause aliasing"
>>>
>>> What happens now is:
>>>
>>> given %4 = select %1, %2, %3
>>>
>>> we do
>>> aliasset(%4) += %1
>>> aliasset(%4) += %2
>>> aliasset(%4) += %3
>>>
>>> The first one is unnecessary.
>>> There can be no alias caused simply because it is referenced in
>>> condition of the select.
>>>
>>>> We still need to process what %1 refers to (and we do).
>>>
>>>
>>> To make this empirical, in your example, we get the right answer in
>>> CFL-AA.
>>>
>>> Interestingly, i'll point out that basic-aa says:
>>> NoAlias: i8* %p, i8** %q
>>> NoAlias: i8** %p.addr, i8** %q
>>>
>>> (I translated your case as best i can :P)
>>>
>>> So you may want to implement it for real if you think it's supposed to
>>> be handled right in basic-aa, because I don't believe it is :)
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150116/17cc9970/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cflaafix.diff
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 4853 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150116/17cc9970/attachment.obj>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list