[LLVMdev] Is address space 1 reserved?

[Matt Arsenault]

> On Jan 7, 2015, at 2:25 PM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote:
> 
> I'm not aware of any such restriction, and I know of several LLVM based systems that use address space 1 for something other than that.
> 
> -Owen

Yes, this would be a problem for us. We use 1 for a normal address space where 0 is invalid. However, we also have a problem where some other address spaces do want 0 to be a valid address, which just sort of don’t work correctly now.

-Matt



> 
> On Jan 7, 2015, at 1:18 PM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com <mailto:listmail at philipreames.com>> wrote:
> 
>> On the review for http://reviews.llvm.org/D6808 <http://reviews.llvm.org/D6808>, majnemer <http://reviews.llvm.org/p/majnemer/> commented that:
>> "Address space 1 has a special meaning in LLVM, it's identical to address space 0 except for the fact that "null" may be dereferenced. You might want to consider a different address space."
>> 
>> This is the first I've heard of this and I can't find any documentation about it being reserved, either in general, or specifically for x86.  Can anyone clarify?
>> 
>> The only address spaces with special meanings I know of are:
>> - 0 (the normal address space, null is not dereferencable)
>> - 256 - TLS, GS relative addressing
>> - 257 - FS relative addressing
>> 
>> Philip
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu>         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu <http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/>
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150107/e2729eaa/attachment.html>