[llvm-dev] Phabricator/Arcanist feedback
Philip Reames via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Dec 28 08:57:38 PST 2015
On 12/28/2015 04:58 AM, Dan Liew via llvm-dev wrote:
>> Interesting, I don't read it that way :) I personally don't use arc to
> Sure the docs don't explicitly state that it's the only way. I just
> took that to be implied because the instructions for requesting a
> review provide multiple methods but the instructions for committing
> only mention using a single method.
>> Again, there is no one correct way. You can use arc, you can just manually
>> put together your commit message. If your commit messages are bad, somebody
>> will eventually start complaining post-commit ;)
>> Feel free to send a patch to make it explicit that using arc is completely
>> optional. We mainly put it there because some people hand't heard of arc and
>> were handling their patches manually and complaining about the web workflow.
> Sure. In order to document the manual alternative I need to know what
> Phabricator looks for to work out it that it should close a review. Is
> Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/<REVISION>
> line in the commit message what it looks for?
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
More information about the llvm-dev