[llvm-dev] Include all the things

[David Blaikie via llvm-dev]

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Russell Wallace via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> Rather than including llvm header files piecemeal on an ongoing basis, I'm
> looking for a way to include all such header files once and for all.
>

That's really going to hurt your compile time, btw... if you're interested
in building a tool to help here, a tool that uses Clang to find and suggest
headers to include (or to remove, to keep the include set minimal to avoid
bloating compile time) would probably be good & I know there are some
people working on such a thing. But it is more work, of course. (& may
benefit from/need C++ modules support)


> To that end, I wrote a Python script to generate include directives for
> all .h files in llvm/include and its subdirectories. This almost works, but
> getting two error messages:
>
> In file included from src\main.cpp:1:
> In file included from src/../llvm.h:254:
> In file included from
> \llvm\include\llvm/DebugInfo/PDB/ConcreteSymbolEnumerator.h:13:
> In file included from
> \llvm\include\llvm/DebugInfo/PDB/IPDBEnumChildren.h:13:
> \llvm\include\llvm/DebugInfo/PDB/PDBTypes.h(444,3) :  error: redefinition
> of enumerator 'Unknown'
>   Unknown,
>   ^
> \llvm\include\llvm/CodeGen/CallingConvLower.h(189,16) :  note: previous
> definition is here
> typedef enum { Unknown, Prologue, Call } ParmContext;
>                ^
> In file included from src\main.cpp:1:
> In file included from src/../llvm.h:298:
> In file included from
> \llvm\include\llvm/DebugInfo/PDB/DIA/DIADataStream.h:13:
> \llvm\include\llvm/DebugInfo/PDB/DIA/DIASupport.h(30,10) :  fatal error:
> 'cvconst.h' file not found
> #include <cvconst.h>
>
> Are there known fixes for these, or is there something I should be doing
> differently?
>

The first one's probably an outright ODR violation (Zach - perhaps you
could take a look at that)

The second is probably because you're including a header that's only
conditionally usable, when you have the right 3rd party package installed
(at least I assume that's the case - Zach?)

Did we actually install that header onto a system without the package
available? Or are you pointing your build at an LLVM source tree?

- Dave


>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20151209/18ff9911/attachment.html>