[llvm-dev] RFC: LTO should use -disable-llvm-verifier

[Rafael Espíndola via llvm-dev]

> Not sure I follow? Generally LTO inputs are going to be "user provided"
(in the sense that they're not produced immediately prior by the same
process - or you'd have just produced a single Module in the first place, I
would imagine) so changing the default still seems problematic in the sense
of allowing 'unbounded' input without verification...

The common case is for the bitcode to be generated by a paired clang. Even
when it is an old bitcode compiled module, the Module itself is created by
the bitcode reader.

Cheers, Rafael
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150831/283aab05/attachment.html>