[LLVMdev] BasicBlock.h in the binary and in the source differ
Zhoulai
zell08v at gmail.com
Thu Apr 9 09:35:10 PDT 2015
Sorry. 'master' branch of most recent release. Actually I use
git clone http://llvm.org/git/llvm.git.
Maybe the issue comes from the binary package?
At line 122 of the BasicBlock.h from <http://llvm.org/releases/download.html
>
const DataLayout *getDataLayout() const;
vs.
Line 118 of the source BasicBlock.h from the above repo:
const Module *getModule() const;
For information, I am concerned with the inconsistency because of this
error message when building the project at
https://github.com/eliben/llvm-clang-samples:
---------------
g++ -fno-rtti -O0 -g
`$HOME/MyLib/clang+llvm-3.6.0-x86_64-apple-darwin/bin/llvm-config
--cxxflags` src_llvm/simple_bb_pass.cpp
`$HOME/MyLib/clang+llvm-3.6.0-x86_64-apple-darwin/bin/llvm-config --ldflags
--libs --system-libs` -o build/simple_bb_pass
*src_llvm/simple_bb_pass.cpp:30:31: error: no member named 'getModule'
in 'llvm::BasicBlock' const DataLayout &DL =
BB.getModule()->getDataLayout(); ~~ ^1 error
generated.Makefile:131: recipe for target 'build/simple_bb_pass'
failedmake: *** [build/simple_bb_pass] Error 1*
Thanks for your ideas.
Zhoulai
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan at codesourcery.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On 4/9/15 10:17 AM, Zhoulai wrote:
>
>> The source is cloned from
>> https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm
>>
>
> Which branch, master or one of the release_* branches?
>
> Jon
>
>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Zhoulai
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Jonathan Roelofs
>> <jonathan at codesourcery.com <mailto:jonathan at codesourcery.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/9/15 9:58 AM, Zhoulai wrote:
>>
>> Hi, I am using LLVM to develop a tool, using Mac OS 10.9. I have
>> download llvm source and binary from
>>
>> http://llvm.org/releases/__download.html
>> <http://llvm.org/releases/download.html>
>>
>> I just find the BasicBlock.h file of the binary package
>>
>>
>> clang+llvm-3.6.0-x86_64-apple-__darwin/include/llvm/IR/__
>> BasicBlock.h
>>
>> is slightly different from that of the source
>>
>> llvm/include/llvm/IR/__BasicBlock.h
>>
>>
>> Where specifically did you download the source from?
>>
>>
>> In particular, llvm:: getModule(..) is included in the latter
>> BasicBlock.h but not in the former BasicBlock.h. Am I
>> misunderstanding
>> something or is it an inconsistency LLVM developers will fix?
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>>
>> Zhoulai
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
>> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/__mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>> <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jon Roelofs
>> jonathan at codesourcery.com <mailto:jonathan at codesourcery.com>
>> CodeSourcery / Mentor Embedded
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Jon Roelofs
> jonathan at codesourcery.com
> CodeSourcery / Mentor Embedded
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150409/63ba0f86/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list