[LLVMdev] EHABI: Remaining issues

[Renato Golin]

On 13 March 2014 19:13, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think emitting both is a good thing, personally. It means that
> generic tools (and possibly even debuggers, given certain runtime
> support) can rely on the DWARF standard, not just the bits we've
> decided should apply to ARM.

Absolutely! I was actually trying to reduce (or remove) the ARM
specific directives and make the EHABI understand the CFI directives,
but that would be a IAS-only feature and we'd have to test both all
the time (more space for bugs).

cheers,
--renato