[LLVMdev] Can we require CFI instructions now?

Rafael EspĂ­ndola rafael.espindola at gmail.com
Wed Mar 12 09:26:18 PDT 2014


On 12 March 2014 12:09, Anshuman Dasgupta <adasgupt at codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
>>> What about hexagon. Do we still need to avoid cfi instructions with it?
>>
>> As far as I know, we've never given CFI any thoughts since the initial
>> implementation of the Hexagon target. I can't really give you an answer
>> right now, but I'll find out and I'll get back to you.
>
>
> Krzysztof and I discussed this. We're in favor of enabling CFI for Hexagon
> since it makes sense to require CFI for all targets. We're running some
> experiments and are discussing this with our assembler team to confirm that
> we can switch. We'll have the results soonand keep LLVMdev updated.

Awesome!

Thanks,
Rafael



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list