[LLVMdev] Another phabricator feature request...

[Duncan P. N. Exon Smith]

> On 2014-Jun-27, at 11:48, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote:
> I know you worked hard to make sure that updating a revision doesn't send email unless there is text typed into one of the boxes Manuel, but I think we should by default put some text into a box (and send the email unless the user deletes that text) when accepting a revision. Otherwise, the final LGTM can accidentally happen on Phab and not reach the mailing list (D4178 for example).
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> I had hoped we can educate people using phab that only text they write gets sent to the list, and that they should only send things to the list, and not manage the state in phab.

Is there a way of disabling the state management interface in phab
entirely?

Then the only way for people to "accept" something is by typing text
to that effect.

> I think wanting to make it possible to make the state in phab more in line with what's visible on the list would be great, but I have problems finding the spare cycles currently (given that I spend most of my phab time cycles with maintenance due to DMARC / other email problems).
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev