[LLVMdev] Another phabricator feature request...

[Manuel Klimek]

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I know you worked hard to make sure that updating a revision doesn't send
> email unless there is text typed into one of the boxes Manuel, but I think
> we should by default put some text into a box (and send the email unless
> the user deletes that text) when accepting a revision. Otherwise, the final
> LGTM can accidentally happen on Phab and not reach the mailing list (D4178
> for example).
>
> Thoughts?
>

I had hoped we can educate people using phab that only text they write gets
sent to the list, and that they should only send things to the list, and
not manage the state in phab. I think wanting to make it possible to make
the state in phab more in line with what's visible on the list would be
great, but I have problems finding the spare cycles currently (given that I
spend most of my phab time cycles with maintenance due to DMARC / other
email problems).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140627/cac74e25/attachment.html>