[LLVMdev] Sanitizer test failure

Renato Golin renato.golin at linaro.org
Mon Jul 28 15:17:28 PDT 2014


Hi Evgeniy,

Yes, it is. The problem here is that the program doesn't fail on my
box (release and debug builds), so I have no idea how to debug the
problem. According to the test, it's ran as "not
chained_origin_with_signals.cc.tmp", expecting it to fail. Also, the
FileCheck expects to find warnings on the output, for which there is
none

Maybe I'm missing some CMake flag or library, and that's why the
signal functionality is not working on my box?

cheers,
--renato

On 25 July 2014 09:39, Evgeniy Stepanov <eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it still an issue?
> Just by looking at the code, I don't see why it could fail. Do you
> need any help debugging it?
>
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
>> I'm compiling compiler-rt via CMake+Ninja on x86_64+ArchLinux and one
>> of the tests fails on ToT:
>>
>> MemorySanitizer :: chained_origin_with_signals.cc
>>
>> The text expects uninitialized warnings while the execution prints
>> nothing, thus FileCheck fails.
>>
>> Anyone seeing this?
>>
>> cheers,
>> --renato
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list