[LLVMdev] New -O3 Performance tester - Use hardware to get reliable numbers

Diego Novillo dnovillo at google.com
Thu Jan 9 08:42:41 PST 2014


On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > sean:~/pg/llvm/llvm % git log --oneline --since='1 month ago' | wc -l
>> > 706
>> > sean:~/pg/llvm/llvm % git log --oneline --since='1 month ago' ./test |
>> > wc -l
>> > 317
>>
>> Wouldn't this also catch commits to code generation that added tests as
>> well?
>>
>
> I'm not sure what you mean or how it would affect what I'm saying. Any
> commit that affects code generation should include a test (there may be some
> rare exceptions, but this is the general rule).

If you pruned the commits that include directory ./test, won't that
prune the associated codegen patch as well? This would cause coverage
loss for the tester.

Or maybe I just did not understand what you were proposing :)


Diego.



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list