[LLVMdev] DominatorTree not updated properly after calling the llvm::SplitBlock.
Andrew Trick
atrick at apple.com
Fri Feb 14 11:13:14 PST 2014
On Feb 14, 2014, at 9:50 AM, Paul Vario <paul.paul.mit at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thanks a lot. But the function "DT->dominate(A,B)" decides the dominance relationship through comparing the DFS numbers, right? At least, in my example, when I check whether the newly split node (i.e., %for.end.split) DOMINATES the original node (I.e., %for.end), the answer is true, which is obviously wrong.
That sounds like a bug. When DFSInfoValid==false, the DFS number does not affect the query. So I don’t know why you’re getting the wrong answer.
I know you don’t have a test case, but I suggest filling a bugzilla PR and attaching a dump of both your IR and Domtree before splitting and after splitting.
-Andy
> Paul
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2014, at 4:34 PM, Paul Vario <paul.paul.mit at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Fellows,
>>
>> I am writing a pass that requires the DominatorTree pass. In the runOnFunction of my own pass, I call llvm::SplitBlock to split a block (%for.end) at it's first insert point. Then, when I dump my dominator tree immediately after, I can see the newly split %for.end.split, but its DFSNumIn and DFSNumOut are not properly updated in llvm::SplitBlock (i.e., still the initialized -1). At the same time, the DT->dump() results also show that DFSInfoValid equals false! I could not figure out what I did wrong, b/c it seems all the analysis updating should be handled by llvm::SplitBlock. Any suggestions on how to approach this situation? Thanks a bunch in advance.
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> DFSNumbers is a cache within the DominatorTree analysis. It is lazily computed after a certain number of queries. It’s kind of hard to incrementally update these numbers because we may have to shift them all.
>
> At any rate, invalid DFS numbers does not mean something is wrong with the analysis.
>
> -Andy
>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------- The actual dump of my dominator tree after SplitBlock --------------------
>>
>> Inorder Dominator Tree: DFSNumbers invalid: 1 slow queries.
>> [1] %entry.barrier {0,27}
>> [2] %entry {1,26}
>> [3] %for.cond {2,25}
>> [4] %for.body {3,6}
>> [5] %for.inc {4,5}
>> [4] %for.end {7,24}
>> [5] %for.end.split {4294967295,4294967295}
>> [6] %if.then {8,15}
>> [7] %if.then13 {9,10}
>> [7] %if.end {11,12}
>> [7] %if.then.if.end_crit_edge {13,14}
>> [6] %if.end14 {16,21}
>> [7] %exit.b4.barrier {17,20}
>> [8] %exit.barrier {18,19}
>> [6] %for.end.if.end14_crit_edge {22,23}
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140214/b346d79d/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list