> Please find it attached. The command I'm using is:
Thanks Chengyu. The code is very different from what you started the
thread with, and seems correct to me:
// x19 == n, x21 == next
ldr x8, [x21, #8]
stp x21, x8, [x19]
stlr x19, [x8]
str x19, [x21, #8]
Can you confirm that this has the same bug when you try to use it?
Cheers.
Tim.