[LLVMdev] Proposal for ""llvm.mem.vectorize.safelen"

[Renato Golin]

On 20 August 2014 20:18, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
> I don't understand. I think that the numbering would need to be specific to the loop id.

I thought the idea was to add it to every load/store in the loop. If
this loop then gets fused with another, or inlined/unrolled becoming
part of another loop, etc., wouldn't those ids conflict?

cheers,
--renato