[LLVMdev] Functions with unnamed parameters in LLVM IR

[Tim Northover]

On 15 August 2014 10:53, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote:
>> I did mean the LangRef, but probably not there, and not to that degree.
>
> For documentation I think being explicit is much better than being implicit.

Sure, but the entire section on functions is 61 lines. Adding 20 to
cover this bit of trivia is *way* out of balance, and I don't think it
actually improves the usability of the documentation for most readers.

> I took a look at the "Identifiers" section [1]. There isn't any
> mention of the basic-block case there.

"Unnamed temporaries are numbered sequentially (using a per-function
incrementing counter, starting with 0). Note that basic blocks are
included in this numbering. For example, if the entry basic block is
not given a label name, then it will get number 0."

Cheers.

Tim.