[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication

[Manman Ren]

>
>
> patch looks fairly obvious/trivial
>
> Have you tried any of the test cases I've described (special members,
> nested types, and member templates - all used across CUs so an earlier CU
> has the type definition and a latter one has one of these extra members)?
> I'd like to see test results for these before we progress.
>

Yes, templates and nested types where we have two MDNodes for the same
class, and one has an extra member.
They work fine with the patch (no assertion failure).

Manman
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131016/a576b831/attachment.html>