[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers

Renato Golin renato.golin at linaro.org
Fri Nov 8 11:51:03 PST 2013


On 8 November 2013 11:29, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote:

> So I don't see that waiting is a significant win. Conversely, it gives us
> less time to get the C++11-enabled code tested across relevant toolchains
> (including perhaps rolling back the change if we find a fatal issue) before
> we release 3.5 next year.
>

That's a good point. Still, I think waiting a month for introducing new
C++11 code wouldn't hurt either.

I'm guessing people reading this thread have already accepted that we're
moving, so they should have be doing all the work to move since last week,
which gives us a nice round December frame for new stuff.

David, is that a comfortable window?

cheers,
--renato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131108/a7c5715a/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list