[LLVMdev] Question about DSA analysis
John Criswell
criswell at illinois.edu
Mon May 20 07:13:36 PDT 2013
On 5/19/13 11:46 AM, Jing Zhou wrote:
> Greeting.
>
> I am working on one DSA related project. Got several questions about
> LLVM's DSA analysis:
>
> 1. I looked through the llvm doc, it seems "-ds-aa" option is the one
> I should use.
> (http://llvm.org/docs/AliasAnalysis.html#the-ds-aa-pass). however
> based on the poolalloc's svn history, this option was removed on (or
> before) 2011. May I know why this one was removed ? and is there any
> equivalent option (or options combination) in current poolalloc project ?
We removed ds-aa because it had bit-rotted and very few people were
using it. There was a patch to resurrect it, but it didn't apply
cleanly (I think we moved from LLVM 3.0 to 3.2 between the time the
patch was submitted and the time I got around to looking at it), and
there was only 1 user of ds-aa, so making it work was low priority.
How you should use the DSA analysis depends on what you're doing. For
intra-procedural alias analysis queries, you can use the DSGraph
straight from the BottomUp or TopDown DSA analysis passes. For both
intra- and inter-procedural alias analysis queries, you can use the
DSNodeEquivs pass. If you need a shape graph, you can use the DSGraph
interface directly.
If you could tell me how you want to use DSA, I can explain which
approach to use and how to make it work.
>
> 2. I checked the svn history of poolalloc. there is no update to trunk
> since last Nov. the release_32 branch was updated this March. I am
> wondering which one is good to use ? and are they compatible with
> latest llvm trunk or llvm release_3_3 branch ?
The release_32 branch is the actively maintained branch at the moment.
When we're ready to to move to LLVM 3.3, we'll merge the release_32
branch back into trunk and then update the code to compile with LLVM 3.3.
While I don't have a timeline yet for when the update to LLVM 3.3 will
happen, I think the earliest date that we'd begin an update would be
July or August.
-- John T.
>
> thank you in advance
>
> btw: I am not in the llvmdev email alias, please include my email
> address in your reply.
>
> -Jing
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130520/ee89b0b8/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list