[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.3 dot releases
Renato Golin
renato.golin at linaro.org
Tue Jun 25 03:10:03 PDT 2013
On 25 June 2013 09:59, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> What are the rules about API / ABI stability within the point releases?
> From our perspective downstream, it would be nice to have bug-fix
> incremental releases that were binary compatible, so that we could just
> pull them in and not worry about breaking anything. It would be okay to
> have things that were source compatible, but slightly less useful. It
> would be of no benefit to us if there are backwards-incompatible API
> changes in the point releases.
>
This is a very sane requirement and I concur binary and API compatibility
should be enforced.
cheers,
--renato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130625/07f04bb0/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list