[LLVMdev] Obsolete PTX is NOT completely removed in 3.2 release

Justin Holewinski justin.holewinski at gmail.com
Fri Jan 11 12:37:17 PST 2013


On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com>wrote:

>
> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 11.01.2013, at 07:36, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Pawel,
> > >
> > >  PTX already be replaced with NVPTX. However, PTX subdirectory
> > > still sit in lib/Target in 3.2 release. Do you think update the
> > > release tarball is a good idea? Also could you remove it from
> > > the trunk?
> >
> > Please do not, under no circumstances, change the 3.2 release tarballs
> at this point. They are mirrored around the world now with cryptographic
> hashes and signatures. Changing them will break things for many people,
> especially for an extremely minor thing like an empty directory.
> >
> > I'm not sure if Pawel's tarball change should be reverted now as it
> already caused uproar, so changing it back might only make matters worse.
> >
> > The tarballs were changed?
>
> r172208
>

Huh... that was a bit premature.



>
> - Ben
>
>


-- 

Thanks,

Justin Holewinski
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130111/9451a2c4/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list