[LLVMdev] llvm.meta (was Rotated loop identification)

[Eric Christopher]

I would only endorse a new llvm.meta approach if we're sure we can unify or
> replace most of the current meta-style intrinsics. But I first need to
> better understand the motivation for those  approaches, which I have not
> personally worked with much (they're somewhat marginalized).
>
> - llvm.dbg
>
>   Are there any problems with our current approach?
>
>
Haven't been following the current discussion, but in general there aren't
any problems with having llvm.dbg as a class of intrinsic.

-eric
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130208/bd0fcf9d/attachment.html>