[LLVMdev] [RFC PATCH 1/2] x86: Fix ModR/M byte output in 16-bit addressing mode

[Eric Christopher]

Sounds good. I'm pretty backlogged but I'll try to get to it as soon as I
can. I've poked Jim as well on the email to have multiple people on the
hook. :)

-eric

On Mon Dec 16 2013 at 12:39:15 PM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org>
wrote:

> On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 19:46 +0000, Eric Christopher wrote:
> >
> > I'm catching up on email at the moment so I don't know if you've done
> > this, but patches should go to llvm-commits for review if you wouldn't
> > mind.
>
> I have done so. I've since worked out that the signed 16-bit relocation
> is probably entirely pointless and I should just drop the assert() from
> the first patch in the series, and drop the second patch entirely. And
> I've gone a little further and have .code16 actually working for the
> "test" case which provoked me into looking at it in the first place. But
> since nobody's responded, it didn't seem worth spamming the list with
> another series just yet. I'll update my git tree at
> http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/llvm.git
>
> --
> dwmw2
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131216/3f3dc88f/attachment.html>