[LLVMdev] Announcement: Phabricator for code reviews

[Manuel Klimek]

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Krzysztof Parzyszek <
kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote:

> On 10/18/2012 4:18 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>
>>
>> Facebook is not the only OAuth provider though. We should be able to
>> support essentially any you would prefer if that's all. Manuel's comment
>> still stands if OAuth is a problem.
>>
>
> My point is that using an OAuth provider should be an option, not a
> de-facto requirement.


I hear you, but I'd be interested in why OAuth is a problem for you - as I
said, if we have good arguments, the phab guys are really quick to come up
with changes. I'm not deeply familiar with authentication schemes.

Thanks,
/Manuel


>
>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted
> by The Linux Foundation
> ______________________________**_________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/**mailman/listinfo/llvmdev<http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121018/43bb9990/attachment.html>