[LLVMdev] RFC: I'm interested in filling the code-owner role for the following...

[Chris Lattner]

On Nov 16, 2012, at 1:12 PM, dag at cray.com wrote:

> Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes:
> 
>> The problem with having >1 person as a code owner for a component, is
>> that it is quite possible that each will assume that someone else is
>> looking at a patch.  No one knows what patches are being watched, etc.
> 
> Isn't this an indication that some kind of formalized process (i.e. a
> patch queue) is desirable?

No - it's an indication that I want one code owner for each logical area.

-Chris