[LLVMdev] RFC: I'm interested in filling the code-owner role for the following...
dag at cray.com
dag at cray.com
Fri Nov 16 13:12:47 PST 2012
Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes:
> The problem with having >1 person as a code owner for a component, is
> that it is quite possible that each will assume that someone else is
> looking at a patch. No one knows what patches are being watched, etc.
Isn't this an indication that some kind of formalized process (i.e. a
patch queue) is desirable?
-David
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list