[LLVMdev] RFC: I'm interested in filling the code-owner role for the following...

dag at cray.com dag at cray.com
Fri Nov 16 13:12:47 PST 2012


Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes:

> The problem with having >1 person as a code owner for a component, is
> that it is quite possible that each will assume that someone else is
> looking at a patch.  No one knows what patches are being watched, etc.

Isn't this an indication that some kind of formalized process (i.e. a
patch queue) is desirable?

                          -David



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list