[LLVMdev] [compiler-rt] is the arm lib complete?

[liangh at codeaurora.org]

So, you mean I should compile libc with clang and link with compiler-rt too?
But how can we expect a user of compiler-rt have a libc compiled in this
way? It's a part of gcc's src code... If compiler-rt is a complete lib, it
should also cover these functions, right?

BTW, if libc is compiled statically, shouldn't itself already contain all
functions it need? I just get confused now...

>> I'm using Clang, with arm-none-linux-gnueabi-g++ as a linker. Although
>> compiler-rt replaced libgcc, we still need other libs such as libc,
>> libm,
>> etc. It seems libc is calling these missing functions.
> If you compile libc with gcc, then yes, you might need arbitrary
> functions from libgcc.
>
> --
> With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
> Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
>