[LLVMdev] Code Ownership - BBVectorize

[Chris Lattner]

On Nov 13, 2012, at 11:43 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote:

> SelectionDAG is big enough to have multiple owners. Legalizer, dag combine, etc. can each have a separate owner. 

I don't think that makes sense given our model of code owner.  The important task here is ensuring that each piece gets reviewed.  Splitting things up at such a fine level doesn't help with that.

-Chris

> 
> Evan
> 
> On Nov 13, 2012, at 5:56 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Nov 13, 2012, at 2:41 PM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote:
>>> Owen Anderson and I would like to be the co-owners of SelectionDAG.
>> 
>> I'm not a big fan of co-owners: how will you know which pieces you each are covering?  Dan Gohman would be another candidate for owner of this area.  Can we have only one owner?
>> 
>> -Chris
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Nov 13, 2012, at 2:29 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> FWIW, I don't think we need any process for folks to be an owner of a
>>>> file (or collection of files) for which they are the primary author of
>>>> all of the code...
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
>>>>> Chris,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'd like to take code ownership of the BBVectorize code. Although not quite directory granularity (because the loop vectorizer is also in that directory), it is self-contained.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks again,
>>>>> Hal
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Hal Finkel
>>>>> Postdoctoral Appointee
>>>>> Leadership Computing Facility
>>>>> Argonne National Laboratory
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>>>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev