[LLVMdev] MCJIT

[Ashok Nalkund]

Can you also tell about inline-asm support in MCJIT for x86? I've been 
trying to get it to work (my previous post: "JIT support for inline asm 
on Linux"), I get an error:

> LLVM ERROR: Inline asm not supported by this streamer because we don't
> have an asm parser for this target

thanks,
ashok

On 5/11/2012 12:44 PM, Kaylor, Andrew wrote:
> Hi Braxton,
>
> I think it’s very good. All of the ExecutionEngine tests pass. I’m not
> aware of any major defects.
>
> I don’t believe that the current implementation sets the permissions on
> JITed memory as you might wish. Namely, I think executable memory may be
> left writeable and data memory may be executable. The current interface
> is also somewhat limited. Basically, you pass a Module to the
> constructor, it JITs that Module immediately and then you can get the
> address of individual functions to execute them. What is there works though.
>
> -Andy
>
> *From:*llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
> *On Behalf Of *Braxton McKee
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:53 AM
> *To:* llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> *Subject:* [LLVMdev] MCJIT
>
> Hi All,
>
> What is the current level of stability of MCJIT using ELF?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Braxton McKee Broad Street Analytics
> www.twitter.com/braxtonmckee <http://www.twitter.com/braxtonmckee>
> www.broadstreetanalytics.com <http://www.broadstreetanalytics.com>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev