[LLVMdev] MCJIT
Kaylor, Andrew
andrew.kaylor at intel.com
Fri May 11 12:44:25 PDT 2012
Hi Braxton,
I think it's very good. All of the ExecutionEngine tests pass. I'm not aware of any major defects.
I don't believe that the current implementation sets the permissions on JITed memory as you might wish. Namely, I think executable memory may be left writeable and data memory may be executable. The current interface is also somewhat limited. Basically, you pass a Module to the constructor, it JITs that Module immediately and then you can get the address of individual functions to execute them. What is there works though.
-Andy
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Braxton McKee
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:53 AM
To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: [LLVMdev] MCJIT
Hi All,
What is the current level of stability of MCJIT using ELF?
Thanks.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Braxton McKee Broad Street Analytics
www.twitter.com/braxtonmckee<http://www.twitter.com/braxtonmckee> www.broadstreetanalytics.com<http://www.broadstreetanalytics.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120511/da4cff16/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list