[LLVMdev] buildbot with -vectorize

[Hal Finkel]

On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:25:13 +0200
Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:

> On 06/21/2012 04:23 PM, Hal Finkel wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 01:03:46 +0200
> > Tobias Grosser<tobias at grosser.es>  wrote:
> >
> >> On 06/20/2012 11:07 PM, Hal Finkel wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:15:12 +0200
> >>> Tobias Grosser<tobias at grosser.es>   wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 02/05/2012 02:42 PM, Hal Finkel wrote:
> >>>>> I think that it would be a good idea to have a buildbot set up
> >>>>> to run the test suite with -vectorize. Could one of the existing
> >>>>> machines do this also?
> >>>>
> >>>> It took some time, but we have this now:
> >>>>
> >>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-nt-O3-vectorize
> >>>>
> >>>> The first run shows that there are a couple of test-suite
> >>>> failures with the vectorizer:
> >>>>
> >>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-nt-O3-vectorize/builds/108/steps/lnt.nightly-test/logs/tests.FAIL
> >>>>
> >>>> Hal, interested to take a look?
> >>>
> >>> If I'm looking at this correctly, there are now no failures.
> >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-nt-O3-vectorize/builds/220/steps/lnt.nightly-test
> >>
> >> I believe there are:
> >>
> >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-nt-O3-vectorize/builds/220/steps/lnt.nightly-test/logs/tests.XFAIL
> >>
> >> They are just automatically XFAILED after they occur a second
> >> time. ;-)
> >
> > OIC... then that's not good...
> >
> > So it seems that prior the build 108 the testing process always
> > timed out (it looks like it had a timeout of 20 minutes which was
> > not long enough). At build 108, it lists those applications as
> > failing.
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > I am pretty sure that there were no x86 test-suite failures when I
> > committed the vectorizer. We'll need to investigate...
> 
> It may be due to the different platform (darwin). The list is sort so 
> maybe you can try some of them on linux.

Build 270 lists some of the nightly tests under improved and regressed
(because I enabled vectorizing comparisons). Is there a way to see the
relative timings? -- I thought that there was but I'm not seeing
anything to click to see a timing history.

 -Hal

> 
> Tobi



-- 
Hal Finkel
Postdoctoral Appointee
Leadership Computing Facility
Argonne National Laboratory